 |
|
| Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. |
|
|
|
| |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Elaine Chao: Model Minority's Poster Child (Score: 1)
by angryindian on Tuesday, October 26 @ 23:14:34 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://angryindian.atspace.org/ | I would like the respondent to point out were I stated that Elaine Chao is a pro-White apologist because she works alongside Whites. (?) I regard her as a pro-White apologist for working alongside this current administration which has a proven track record for institutional racism.
The notion that there exists "good and bad" in all people is to be honest non-sensical and here's why. Whites, and their non-White excusers love to spout this redundant, let's all feel good mantra because it assumes a colour-blind ethnically neutral social system. It completely and deliberately overlooks colonialism and the results of such practices. If America was honest about its colonial basis I would really, and I mean this, really promote this reasoning. But we still tell children of all races that Columbus discovered a barren and empty land and that slavery actually did those lucky Africans a really big favour. Without a true accounting of history,such statements to me are groundless. Please remember, I am not attacking you, just your reasoning and even in that regard, I truly wish your vision was workable. But sadly it isn't.
This administration,(as was the last and all previous cabinents since 1776) have been based on maintaining the White status quo.
The Florida mis-election is a perfect place to start as you do not need to be of African descent to see blatant injustice. The Bush administration's support for racial profiling, (before and after 9/11) by municipal as well as federal law enforcement, their extremely poor record on Indian sovereignty, the federal attack on affirmative action, (oddly enough not on any provable minority handouts but solid scholars working to enter mainstream academics) and the idiotic statements made by the Commander-in-Chief himself when speaking to non-White heads of state, (Presdent Bush remarked to the President of Brazil that he was shocked to see so many Blacks in Brazil which offended the official and his entourage).
In other words, its not what ethnicities she works with, its who she chooses to work with. Ms. Chao does not just have a job, she represents the establishment. If you feel that she is exempt from such associations, then you should also endevour to rework the history behind the German Nazi Party. In Nuremburg during the trials following the cessation of hostilities, Julius Striecher was condemned to death not for actually participating in the Final Solution, but primarily for being a part of the machine that allowed the party to function. As American Justice Robert Jackson commented during Striecher's sentencing, it was his willing and conscious involvement with a political group that he was fully aware harboured an anti-Jewish agenda.
I fail to see how Ms. Chao is exempt from such reasoning. If you can i'd really like to hear why. |
| Parent |
|
|
