 |
|
| Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. |
|
|
|
| |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Ode to Smart, Strong and Sexy Asian American Men (Score: 1)
by pineappleheadindc on Monday, May 10 @ 12:47:07 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) | poisenedrice wrote: I agree. It's definitely three steps backwards for all the left-wing "feminist" AFs, such as Maxine Hong Kingston, who push their anti-AM agendas in order to gain sympathy from a WM audience.
To which I reply:
Dude, it's the RIGHT (WHITE) WING that is your enemy. They're the party of sell-outs like Michelle Malkin and Elaine Chao. They're the party that says that "white is right".
Take a moment to rethink. Look around and see things for what they are.
|
| Parent |
|
Re: Ode to Smart, Strong and Sexy Asian American Men (Score: 1)
by Andrew (Use the Write to Us Link) on Sunday, May 09 @ 22:36:39 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://modelminority.com | It's definitely three steps backwards for all the left-wing "feminist" AFs ... who push their anti-AM agendas in order to gain sympathy from a WM audience.
1. What do opposition to the war in Iraq, to faith-based public policy, and to tax cuts for the rich have to do with having an anti-AM agenda?
2. Given that WMs are 80% conservatives, isn't it deeply counterintuitive to describe the pandering to WMs in these books as being motivated by "left-wing" ideology?
3. Doesn't your statement reveal more about your own personal political ideology rather than about whether AMs are better served by liberal or conservative political agendas? |
| Parent |
|
|
