Questions By Kevin Matthews
Answers By Eric Hayot
Excerpted from "Q&A With Eric Hayot"
©2005
UCLA International
Institute
November 8, 2005
Q: What is your particular interest in torture?
A: I'm not just interested in torture. That's part of what I'm interested in,
and it's probably the most spectacular part.
I'm interested in a much broader European and American experience, and
Chinese experience, of Chinese bodies in pain. And some of those reactions, some
of those experiences, have to do with [westerners and Chinese people] looking at
images of Chinese people being tortured.
But some of them have to do with things like the first Western missionary
hospital in China, which also obviously deals with Chinese bodies in pain, but
does so in order to heal them.
Some of them have to do with reports about the way that Chinese people behave
towards people who are in pain. And that pain can sometimes be torture.
The broader historical scope in which I'm looking at this is the history of
the West's relation with China in the era of modernity, which starts around the
1550s, to my mind, and goes to the present.
I'm also going to talk about adoption, the adoption of Chinese children, as a
kind of event or moment in this relation, this Western relation to Chinese
bodies, that's focused around notions, almost always, of sympathy and care.
We don't like to think of children as being bought and sold, but obviously
the adoption of Chinese children requires the payment of fees. This is an
enormous international economy that has profound effects on immigration, the
flow of bodies transnationally, the ethnic make-up of American families,
especially gay families, which are able to occasionally adopt children from
China even though they can't adopt them from the United States, civic
organizations connected to families with Chinese children, and so on and so
forth.
My argument is that these forms of care, which at the individual level are
almost always expressions of generosity, are caught up in a large-scale
management that's occasionally conscious, but mostly unconscious, of Chinese
bodies—in the framework of what becomes international human rights. But it
doesn't really become that until later on, that is to say, in the late twentieth
century.
Q: How does adoption fit into "pain"?
A: It's connected to "care." First of all, if you look at the adoption stuff,
what they will talk about is how terrible the living conditions of the Chinese
orphans are. Which is absolutely the case. They are terrible. So every kid who
gets adopted out of those conditions is very lucky.
So this is why "pain," because what's connected to this notion of pain is
this idea that there are children in pain that you are going to save, who there
is an active attempt to care for. And the act of caring assumes pain, or assumes
the potential of pain, assumes that someone could be in pain if they're not
cared for.
Secondly, it's about the export—I'm just writing about this. Think about
compassion or caring as a kind of export commodity. The way that is works is
that you basically have an excess of compassion or care, and you send it abroad.
There's always the implication that you're doing it because these people
couldn't care for themselves, or don't want to, or are too stupid to, or are
evil, or whatever.
The classic formulation of this in the Indian context has to do with the
British making sati illegal. Sati is where the widow throws herself or is forced
to throw herself on the funeral pyre of her dead husband.
[Postcolonial theorist] Gayatri Spivak famously refers to this as "white men
saving brown women from brown men." What that formulation captures very nicely
is the degree to which so much of this kind of international trading in passion
is gendered and has to do with European countries saving non-European women from
non-European men.
And in the case of Chinese adoption this is absolutely the case, because
almost all of the Chinese adoptees are female because of the politics of gender
in China.
So you have this very generous act, in which American parents basically
decide to spend some enormous portion of their income and their time to raise a
child that does not originally belong to them. And then you have the larger
context in which Chinese girls have become a kind of export commodity, with all
the complexities that that implies.
Hayot, an associate professor of English at the University of Arizona, was a 2005-06 Global Fellow at the UCLA International Institute.