By Dan
The
Marmot's Hole
May 31, 2005
Daniel Hong’s piece came off as inflammatory. At the same time, I agreed
with many of its points.
The following is long, but try to suffer through it and honestly think about
its points.
It often boils down to this:
White men enjoy a “halo effect” due to western global domination in
economics, entertainment, etc., derived from the lands and resources (which
their ancestors stole from indigenous peoples). Some then exploit this power in
unequal relationships.
Consequently, the positions of Asian females, Asian-American females, and
white men are radically different.
1) In Asia: Some women see Hollywood movies and the power of western nations.
Those countries come to represent more wealth, modernity, more “space” to
simply live, and a less competitive environment, etc.
Rather than being attracted to the man himself, she is attracted to what he
represents. Even if in reality, he is someone who would beat his wife, a drug
user, and an overall degenerate, it is difficult to separate fiction from
reality.
2) For some Asian-American women: Often they are raised in white-dominated
environments. That’s also all they’ve been exposed to in the media. Every
main character in a book, every politician, every model in a magazine, every
movie star they’ve ever seen has been a white man.
I remember reading a study of this little black girl in a psychology text.
She had been raised in an all-white environment. Her teacher noticed that she
would wash her hands over and over in school. The teacher asked her why she did
that, and the child responded words to the effect that “lighter skin was
better.”
People like this don’t outgrow their self-hate; they internalize it as they
grow older. For them dating a white man is a way of fitting in, of belonging,
with their larger society. Never underestimate the human desire to be “part of
the group.” People are social pack animals.
3) For loser white men who obsess over Asian girls: It’s an easy way to get
a woman, who in a perfectly equal world, would be far out of their league.
We’ve all met the dungeons and dragons-playing/math club member/computer
geek/shy engineer/anime freaks who stalk Asian girls on the internet and on
school campuses across the nation. You can even meet some at your local Asian
church in the States.
They’ve accepted their loser status in their own society; they have no
choice.
But instinctively, they understand they have a better chance in a
less-powerful society, where not who they are, but what they represent, becomes
the defining factor.
They can utilize the “halo effect,” which doesn’t work on white girls
(because they’re white themselves and will see him for who he is), to get
girls who fantasize about the west or about fitting in with larger American
society.
For the truly f*cked up among those guys, they don’t have the ability to
relate to women as real individuals, and Asian females represent a “safe
object” for them to approach.
More extreme examples of relationships characterized by unequal societal
power would be a 14 year-old girl willingly dating a 35 year-old man, or a girl
from a poor country (like some in Southeast Asia or Eastern Europe) willingly
traveling as a mail-order bride to a more developed nation.
Think about this: In most cases in Asia, the couple don’t even speak the
same language well, let alone share the same culture. Yet modern psychologists
believe that healthy human relationships are based on similarities, like both
being Christian, or outdoorsy folk, or deadheads.
What do such pairs have in common? Typically they lack even the ability to
carry on a proper conversation, let alone find out whether they agree that
Beethoven is superior to Mozart.
Yes, there are exceptions to the rule and I’m not against interracial
relationships per se, just against those that are based on power inequalities,
fetishes, stereotypes, and self-hatred.